Skip Nav

The Death Penalty: Pro and Con

41 comments

❶Pro and Con Introduction Officially, thousands of people are sentenced to death every year in countries where the death penalty is practiced.

Top British Essays

Death Penalty Persuasive Essay


This was due to other possible murderers being deterred from committing murder after realizing thatother criminals are executed for their crimes. Capital punishment also acts as a deterrent for recidivism the rate at which previously convicted criminals return to committing crimes after being released ; if the criminal is executed he has no opportunity to commit crimes again. Some may argue that there is not enough concrete evidence to use deterrence as an argument for the death penalty.

The reason some evidence may be inconclusive is that the death penalty often takes a while to be carried out; some prisoners sit on death row for years before being executed. This can influence the effectiveness of deterrence because punishments that are carried out swiftly are better examples to others. Although the death penalty is already effective at deterring possible criminals, it would be even more effective if the legal process were carried out more quickly instead of having inmates on death row for years.

The death penalty also carries out retribution justly. When someone commits a crime it disturbs the order of society; these crimes take away lives, peace, and liberties from society. Giving the death penalty as a punishment simply restores order to society and adequately punishes the criminal for his wrongdoing.

Retribution also serves justice for murder victims and their families. This lack of malice is proven in the simple definition of retribution: The death penalty puts the scales of justice back in balance after they were unfairly tipped towards the criminal.

The morality of the death penalty has been hotly debated for many years. Those opposed to the death penalty say that it is immoral for the government to take the life of a citizen under any circumstance. It is immoral to not properly punish a person who has committed such a horrendous crime. The criminal is also executed humanely; in no way is he subjected to torture or any form of cruelty. All states that use the death penalty use lethal injection; the days of subjecting a prisoner to hanging or the electric chair are long gone in the US.

Inmates are first given a large dose of an anesthetic so they do not feel any pain Bosner ; this proves that the process is made as humane as possible so the inmates do not physically suffer.

Although the issue of morality is very personal for many people, it is important to see the facts and realize that capital punishment does take morality into account and therefore is carried out in the best way possible. The eighth amendment to the United States Constitution prevents cruel and unusual punishment. Many opponents of capital punishment say that execution is cruel and unusual punishment and therefore violates the Constitution.

As was stated earlier, the recipient of the death penalty is treated humanely and is not tortured in any way, shape, or form. After the anesthetic is administered the person feels no pain; the only part of the process that could be considered painful is when the IV is inserted, but that is done in hospitals on a daily basis and no one is calling it unconstitutional.

The Supreme Court has repeatedly upheld the death penalty as constitutional in cases they have presided over. In the case of Furman v. The Supreme Court has not found capital punishment to be unconstitutional, and therefore this argument for abolition is invalid. Another argument put forth by death penalty abolitionists is the possibility of executing an innocent person. Many people that argue this overestimate how often this happens, it is an extremely rare occurrence and has not happened since the death penalty was reintroduced in Mistakes will be made in any system which relies upon human testimony for proof.

We should be vigilant to uncover and avoid such mistakes. Our system of justice rightfully demands a higher standard for death penalty cases. Stewart points out that death penalty cases are held to a much higher standard. Due process in these cases takes much longer so that the court can be absolutely sure that the person is guilty before sentencing him to execution.

This helps to eliminate any errors that could lead to executing the wrong person. He also points out that although there is a small possibility for mistakes to be made, this does not mean capital punishment should be abolished. If everything that had the potential for harmful mistakes were outlawed, society would be extremely crippled.

It is true that there is disproportionality when it comes to the races and classes that most frequently receive the death penalty. It has been proven that minorities and those with lower income levels are overrepresented on death row. This is not due to discrimination; this is due to the higher rate at which these groups commit crime ProCon.

It has been argued that poverty breeds criminality; if this is true then it makes sense that those at a lower income level would more frequently be sentenced to execution than those at higher income levels ProCon. It has also been proven that minorities are disproportionately poor, and therefore they would also be more likely to receive the death penalty.

Ernest van den Haag said it best:. Do we have free will or not? If not, this could bring into question not just the death penalty but all forms of sentencing whether it is capital punishment or not.

New neurological research can now predict the likelihood of someone becoming violent and may help with future awareness on these issues. More importantly, there appears to be a general reduction in the number of death sentences even in the countries continuing to uphold the death penalty.

It is arguable that countries still using the death penalty do so purely in response to criminality and try to deter future criminals with it. Ironically, many of the countries that have the death penalty suffer from higher crime rates. The death penalty does not cause the problem but it is merely a response to it. And while the death penalty is usually implemented by autocracy or religious doctrine, it is almost never used in response to actual modern societal values.

Therefore, the case against the death penalty is much stronger than the case for it. This would be the same for anyone who believes that ethics are more important than any of the possible practical benefits. You think about how you may feel as you watch him being executed.

You wonder about the families of the other victims. Every once in a while he turns and looks at you. While the medical examiner is giving his testimony and describing what he found, the killer turns and looks at you. You will never forget him. Knowing that another parent will not have to go through what you are going through because of him.

Knowing that another young girl will not know unspeakable horror at his hands. His story, his actions, his sickness can die with him. And that makes you grateful. More and more states are adopting the death penalty. As of April 1, , the death penalty was authorized by 37 states, the Federal Government, and the U.

Death penalty laws can be traced back as far as the 18th century B. I believe capital punishment is appropriate because it provides a strong deterrence against future crime, it protects the rights of victims, and because everyone benefits from it.

My first reason for supporting capital punishment is that it is less expensive than life without parole. The up front costs of the death penalty are a lot higher than equivalent life without parole cases, but JFA: Cost comparisons are only valid if you compare the costs of death penalty to life without parole cases. Many people believe that costs to appeal a death penalty case are high. Even though abolitionists have greatly exaggerated the cost of death penalty cases, death penalty cases still prove to be a lot less expensive over time than death penalty equivalent life without parole cases.

Death penalty costs are mainly appeals costs, and life without parole prisoners get the same appeals and should be considered to bear the same costs. My second reason for supporting capital punishment is that it deters crime.

Studies over the past dozen years have shown that capital punishment is a deterrent to murder. They say that between 3 and 18 lives would be saved by the execution of each convicted killer. Abolitionists claim that people are just as safe when murderers are in prison, but some of them recruit other people to kill while they are there. Some prisoners kill guards, and other inmates. In the Philadelphia Industrial Correction Center in , a man was serving two life sentences, and was sentenced to three more after he was convicted of stabbing three prison guards.

Or, in , when a Beeville, Texas prison guard was killed by an inmate already serving a sentence for murder. At the Florida State Prison in Starke in , Two death row inmates were killed by their fellow inmates. Murderers end up getting out because of law changes, parole board changes, and because people forget the past. A man named James Moore raped and strangled 14 year old Pamela Moss in Her parents decided not to go with the death penalty as long as he got life without parole, but thanks to a change in sentencing laws in , James Moore is eligible for parole every two years.

He was sentenced to life in prison after the U. S Supreme court struck down the death penalty as then imposed. McDuff was released in when Texas prisons were overflowing. Within days, the naked body of a 31 year old prostitute named Sarafia Parker had shown up in a field near Temple, beaten and strangled.


Main Topics

Privacy Policy

Pro Capital Punishment. March 29, Get involved in supporting capital punishment by contacting moiprods.tk, and by writing to your congressperson. good lil essay y'got here.

Privacy FAQs

Persuasive Essay Why Capital Punishment Should Remain in Effect Stefanie Ridgway DeVry University, ENGL Professor Adams April 19, Capital punishment, otherwise known as the death penalty, has been effective tool in our country’s justice system since its inception.

About Our Ads

Capital Punishment -- Pro essaysThesis Statement: Although the opponents of capital punishment believe this to be immoral and non-productive, advocates of capital punishment have proven this to be a cost effective, and ethically correct deterrent of future murders. II. Pros of capital punishm. Category: Argumentative Persuasive Essays; Title: Capital Punishment Essay - Benefits of the Death Penalty. My Account. Capital Punishment Essay - Benefits of the Death Penalty Pro Capital Punishment Essays] Research Papers words ( pages) Related Searches.

Cookie Info

Capital punishment and the practice of the death penalty is an issue that is passionately debated in the United States. Opponents of the death penalty claim that capital punishment is unnecessary since a life sentence accomplishes the same objective. Death Penalty Essay Pro. Home Flashcards Flashcards Home Create Flashcards Death Penalty Essay. Capital punishment or the death penalty is a legal process whereby a person is put to death by the state as a punishment for a crime. The judicial decree that someone be punished in this manner is a death sentence, while the actual process of.