Skip Nav

Physician Assisted Suicide Pros and Cons Essay Sample

Physician Assisted Suicide Pros and Cons Essay Sample

❶Trust those doctors who have a lot of experience related particularly to terminal diseases under their belt. What are needed now are laws permitting voluntary euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide surrounded with a bodyguard of rules -- but not so many that the patient in unable to jump through all the hoops.

Get Full Essay

By Derek Humphry
Why I believe in Voluntary Euthanasia and Assisted Suicide

They need an appointed advocate to be there in case they cannot express their needs. Our children were not pleased with some of our decisions but I know that they love me enough to honor our wishes. Physician assisted suicide is not a new issue but has been around for a very long time and there are many alternatives to physician assisted suicide.

There are concerns that our society will begin to see assisted suicide as a legitimate way of solving all our pain and suffering. Only one state in the United States has legalized physician assisted suicide, which is Organ and they have to follow certain rules and qualifications before they can get help from their physician.

There are many other countries that do participate in physician assisted suicide and some physicians may do this without the patient even knowing, that is why now citizens in the Netherlands carry a card that says Do Not Euthanize Me.

Physician assisted suicide is not for everyone, but I think that we should respect some ones wishes if they decide to end their life. I am glad that I live in America and do not have to worry about carrying a card that states do not kill me please. My mom is from a large family and with this size of a family there will be death. This year we have had four deaths and the two that have affected me the most was my moms and a cousin that was about four years younger than me.

Like my mom he fought for his life and in the end lost his battle. He was burned on eighty present of his body when the gas tanker he was welding on blew up. The doctor did not give the family any chance of him making it through the night and told them to think about taking him off the life support. My uncle, aunt and his siblings said no to this but his wife and two children said yes because he was not responding to anyone.

The family came to a compromise and waited till morning to make their decision. By morning he was responsive and cold hold his thumb up for yes and down for no, so the family left him on the life support.

In the days to follow he was in a lot of pain and after several skin drafts he got pneumonia , then his body started to shut down and the doctor again told them that it did not look good. And in the end his wife and two children decided to take him off of life support after he was unresponsive to any stimulation even though his parent were against the decision to bring some closure to a dying man.

Even though I do not agree with physician assisted suicide it does not mean that there is a right or wrong answer. Last April my mother lost her battle to live and be with us. She fought till her body was so week that when the doctor went to put in a stint to use to do dialyses on her she had a heart attack.

The doctor put her on a ventilator because my father was not there, but in the waiting room where they had sent him. It was something he had promised my mom that he would not let happen. It is something that just fell through the crack between home and the city. When we finally got to go back in the room my dad cried and we had to watch as she laid there and pleaded with her eyes for us to do something. We had to wait for the doctor to come in and talk to us before we could have anything done.

He explained that if we took her off the machine she would not last for more than ten minutes but it was our choice to make. My dad set beside my mom and explained what the doctor told us and asked her if she understood what he had said and she knotted her head that she understood that if they took the ventilator away she would stop breathing.

We agreed with her decision and her last words to us were I Love you all. It is a hard thing to have to do so even though it is morally wrong in most eyes and I do not think anybody has a right to take a life there are just some cases you cannot be the judge and jury on. It may not have been the moral thing to do but for our family it was the right thing to do for a wife and mother that had suffered through three heart attacks and numerous other surgeries. She said she was ready to go home and that is where she is in Heaven.

It has been hard on my dad but he is strong if not for his self then for us kids. My parents would have been married fifty years this month and we spent it with dad. So you can see that even though physician assisted suicide may be morally wrong no one knows what they will do until they are faced with that kind of family situation. I still think that physician assisted suicide is wrong and I am glad that it is not legal in our state. I think if the physician has done everything that he can for his patient then he has done his job.

As for my cousin I am glad that it was not my decision to make. I believe that the deontological theory is the one to use for my thoughts about physician assisted suicide.

It states that the sanctity of life is very precious and valuable and demands respect from others and reverence for oneself. That suicide is so wrong because it violates our moral duty in honoring the value of life.

So really the question should incurable patients be able to commit physician assisted suicide, and with all the pros and cons of this debate maybe the decision should be up to the individual. We and our lord are the only ones that know for sure how much each of us as individuals can endure. Is it something you would want for yourself?

Current Opinions with Annotations. The irony of supporting physician — assisted suicide: US Suprem Court rules against physician — assisted suicide. Ethics and Social Responsibility. The Virtues of Physician — Assisted Suicide. Nursing is a unique healthcare profession that is an affiliation in maintaining and delivering healthcare services, education, health advice, and counseling.

The aim of the research and the presentation is to educate nurses on the advanced changes to health care delivery in the American healthcare system. The economic changes in the USA translate into healthcare evolution. Healthcare reform has been put I place to curb They provide advice and instruction on taking care of the teeth and gums and on a diet choices that affect oral health. Occupational Outlook Handbook Dentists usually work four or five days a week and full-time dentists work about forty hours a week, but some may work more.

Effective communication is essential in all health and social care settings as part of building and maintaining good patient-professional relationships. This includes language at an appropriate level and using methods of communication that the individual is comfortable with This essay is based on the Care of a patient named as Mrs Briggs. It will be written as a rational account, adopting a problem solving approach to her care.

She is elderly and has been admitted onto a medical ward in the hospital, following a stroke. Even if a hopelessly ill person is requesting assistance in dying for the most compassionate reasons, and the helper is acting from the most noble of motives, any form of direct euthanasia remains a crime in the remainder of the Anglo-American world.

You cannot ask to be killed. Punishments for this are usually 'life' and for assisted suicide, fines or up to fourteen years in prison. It is this catch-all prohibition which ERGO and other right-to-die groups wish to change. In a caring society, under the rule of law, we claim that there must be exceptions for the hopelessly ill after all other avenues have been exhausted.

Jack Kevorkian was guilty in law but morally innocent in my view of helping a terminal man to die by lethal injection. A Michigan jury found him guilty of second-degree murder and he was jailed for years. In recent years two spouses in New York State have been imprisoned for assisting their sick wives to die. Exactly there is the huge law reform problem we have to surmount.

The word 'euthanasia' comes from the Greek -- Eu, "good", and Thanatos, "death". But the word 'euthanasia' has acquired a more complex meaning in modern times -- it is generally taken nowadays to mean taking action to achieve a good death. Suicide, self-deliverance, auto-euthanasia, aid-in-dying, assisted suicide, physician-assisted suicide, physician-assisted dying -- call it what you like -- can be justified by the average supporter of the right to die movement for the following reasons:.

Also, if a doctor asked for a death certificate knows that the patient was in an advanced state of terminal illness then not much fuss will be made over the precise cause of death. Police, paramedics, medical examiners, and coroners put a low priority on investigation of suicide, particularly when evidence comes before them that the person was dying anyway. Some claim that it is sufficient to legalize physician-assisted suicide and not voluntary euthanasia as well.

I have never taken that halfway view. Having considered the logic in favor of euthanasia, a person should also contemplate the arguments against it:. First, should the person go instead into a hospice program and receive not only first-class pain management but also comfort care and personal attention? Hospices by and large do a great job with skill and love. The right-to-die movement supports their work.

But not everyone wants a lingering death; not everyone wants that form of care. Today many terminally ill people take the marvelous benefits of home hospice programs and still accelerate the end when suffering becomes too much.

Some 60 percent of those who took advantage of the Oregon physician-assisted suicide law the first two years were in hospice care. A few hospice leaders claim that their care is so excellent that there is absolutely no need for anyone to consider euthanasia. They are wrong to claim perfection. Neither hospice nor euthanasia has the universal answer to all dying. Fortunately most, but not all, terminal pain can today be controlled with the sophisticated use of drugs, but the point these leaders miss is that personal quality of life is vital to some people.

If one's body has been so destroyed by disease that it is not worth living, then that is an intensely individual decision which should not be thwarted. In some cases of the final days in hospice care, when the pain is very serious, the patient is drugged into unconsciousness 'terminal sedation'.

If that way is acceptable to the patient, fine. But some people do not wish their final days to be spent in that drugged limbo. There ought not to be conflict between hospice and euthanasia -- both are valid options in a caring society. Both are appropriate to different people with differing medical needs and ethical values. Later in the 21st century, I am confident that hospice will become a place where people go either for comfort care, terminal sedation, or for assisted suicide.

It is the appropriate place for a dignified end. Another consideration is theological: Is suffering, and relating to Jesus Christ's suffering on the cross, a part of preparation for meeting God? Are you merely a steward of your life, which is a gift from God, and which only He may take away? My response is this: It just does not fit. There are millions of atheists and agnostics, as well as people of various religions, degrees of spiritual beliefs, and they all have rights to their choices in abortion and euthanasia, too.

Many Christians who believe in euthanasia justify it by reasoning that the God whom they worship is loving and tolerant and would not wish to see them in agony. They do not see their God as being so vengeful as refusing them the Kingdom of Heaven if they accelerated the end of their life to avoid prolonged, unbearable suffering. Another consideration must be that, by checking out before the Grim Reaper routinely calls, is one depriving oneself of a valuable period of quality life?

Is that last period of love and companionship with family and friends worth hanging on for? Our critics heavily use the argument that this is the case. In my twenty years in this movement, and being aware of many hundreds of self-deliverances, I can attest that even the most determined supporters of euthanasia hang on until the last minute -- sometimes too long, and lose control.

The wiser ones gather with their families and friends to say good-byes; there are important reunions and often farewell parties. There is closure of wounds and familial gaps just the same as if the person was dying naturally - perhaps more so since the exact timing of the death is known. Euthanasia supporters enjoy life and love living, and their respect for the sanctity of life is as strong as anybody's: They are willing, if their dying is distressing to them, to forego a few weeks or a few days at the very end and expire at a time of their choice.

Moreover, they are not the types to worry what the neighbors will think. There is another rightist argument that the acceptance of euthanasia practices will quickly destroy the traditional bond of trust between doctor and patient; that the patient will never know if the doctor is going to kill them or not; that commercialized medical practices will jump at the chance to get rid of long-term patients who are short of insurance funding. Those arguments have been answered by the 20 years euthanasia has been practiced in the Netherlands, and by the nearly three years physician-assisted suicide has been available in Oregon.

No evidence of a breakdown in relationships has emerged. Those doctors who are ethically opposed to hastening the end of life just don't do it.

The laws in the Netherlands, Oregon, and the ones which have failed to pass, all give medical professionals the right to refuse to be involved -- a conscience clause.

This exemption will always be so as far as I am concerned. In fact, many patients hold their medical advisors in higher regard if they know that he or she will go to great lengths to keep them from terminal suffering, even to the extent of providing, if necessary, a gracious final exit. What people often do not realize is that, for many, just knowing how to kill themselves is itself of great comfort. It gives them the assurance to fight harder and therefore often extends lives just a bit longer.

Many people have remarked to me that my book, 'Final Exit' is the best insurance policy they've ever taken out. Once such people know how to make a certain and dignified deliverance, with loved ones supporting them, they will often renegotiate the timing of their death. For example, a man in his 90s called to tell me his health was so bad he was ready to terminate his life.

I advised him to read 'Final Exit,' which he did and he called me back. He had managed to get hold of lethal drugs from a friendly doctor and so everything was in position. Now he had the knowledge, the drugs, and encouraged by the control and choice now in his grasp, he had negotiated new terms with himself concerning his fate.

Surely, for those who want this way, this is commendable and is in fact an extension rather than a curtailment of life's span. Thanks to the work in the last century of a forceful right-to-die movement, a hidden reality has emerged about terminal suffering, indicating that the time has come for change.

What are needed now are laws permitting voluntary euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide surrounded with a bodyguard of rules -- but not so many that the patient in unable to jump through all the hoops. With the inevitability of gradualness, as the idea takes hold amongst rising generations, reform will undoubtedly come. We who believe must ceaselessly work for it. The above essay may be reproduced for scholarly purposes without permission being sought, provided source acknowledgement is given.


Main Topics

Privacy Policy

Assisted Suicide: Comparative Essay From the beginning of its existence, the sole purpose of the health care industry is to increase the quality of life. However, when a patient’s life is coming to an end, healthcare professionals strive to provide a comfortable death with minimal pain.

Privacy FAQs

Assisted Suicide Essay Words | 7 Pages. Assisted Suicide (Euthanasia) There probably isn’t one person that can say that they haven’t watched somebody they love in some way suffer from and ultimately die from some sort of unfortunate disease. Assisted suicide is .

About Our Ads

Assisted Suicide Essay. Persuasive Essay Assisted suicide is the suicide of a person, done with the help of another person but mostly a physician. (Wikipedia) This can be a very debatable topic because it has actually been legalized in different parts of the world. Laws making suicide illegal or banning physician-assisted suicide have no such effect on a persons cognitive weighing of the pro's and con's of their decision, therapy would. Laws banning physician-assisted suicide have little or no effect in this area. /5(5).

Cookie Info

Physician Assisted Suicide Pros and Cons Essay Sample. The question is should incurable patients be able to commit physician assisted suicide, and depending on which group you talk to the pros or cons they both have well developed arguments as to which is right and which one is wrong. An essay by Derek Humphry. The movement for choice in dying is dedicated to the view that there are at least two forms of suicide. One is 'emotional suicide', or irrational self-murder, in all of it .