Skip Nav

Essay on the Death Penalty

The problem of flawed executions

❶Through the lengthy appeals process, a person that will ultimately be sentenced to execution can spend years and millions on appealing and refighting their charges to, ultimately, no avail.

Opposing the death penalty

Helping students improve writing skills since 2000!
Death Penalty Persuasive Essay
Death Penalty Essay Topics

It is a punishment that is accepted legally and sees persons convicted of serious crimes lose their lives for committing serious crimes. This type of punishment was popular with most countries until the twentieth century. It lost popularity when human rights crusaders rose up to the occasion and condemned it. Countries that believe in demo. The death penalty is killing a person as punishment for a crime.

My research question is "To what extent has the death penalty in France changed since it was first established? Perhaps one of the most controversial issues this nation or world will ever face is the function and purpose of the capital punishment system known as the death penalty.

Since the beginning of the instatement of the death penalty there has been wide spread controversy over its use as well as its practice. This topic has caused lots of commotion between groups that are pro death penalty and those t.

On April 16, Zackariah Melcher committed a crime of killing his wife Christian Melcher, his son Jaiden Melcher and his unborn child. On August 3, Zackariah was pled guilty to three counts of murder.

Do you believe that the death penalty is the right form of justice for the actions that Zachariah Melcher committed? Death penalty is just one form of actions of justice provided for us rathe. In our society there are many criminals that get away with no punishment for their crimes. Some of these people are walking around our cities with no remorse and waiting to strike again. When you walk down the street and you see a man walking on the opposite direction, you probably don't think that he could be a cold blooded killer and if someone asks you right this minute if you are pro or con de.

Since childhood we have been taught this indisputable truth. Ask yourself, then, what is capital punishment? In its simplest form, capital punishment is defined as one person taking the life of another. Coincidentally, that is the definition of murder. There are 36 states with the death penalty, and they must change.

These states need to abolish it on the grounds that it carries a. Want to divide a room fairly quickly? Get a conversation going about justifying the death penalty. That will scatter folks, absolutely. Plus, everyone will feel differently about the issue. Some will hold some deeply rooted convictions about the topic: Should a person be sentenced to death because they deliberately killed another person? Isn't God their ultimate judge, and because of this, shouldn.

Capital punishment or Death penalty is a legal process by which a person is killed by the state as punishment for a crime committed. The ruling condemning someone to death is called death sentence, while the process that leads to death is called execution. Crimes that can result in the death penalty are called capital crimes.

The word capital comes from the term Latin capitalism, meaning "referrin. The most severe of all sentences: Also known as the death penalty, capital punishment this is the most severe form of corporal punishment as it is requires law enforcement officers to kill the offender. It has been banned in many countries, in the United States, an earlier move to eliminate capital punishment has now been reversed and more and more states.

You have heard from the affirmative side and you may disagree or agree with some of their points, but the reality is that their plan will not and cannot succeed in today's society. True, on paper the plan looks very good, but it will not work. Today's present system, with the death penalty is much better off then without it. The negative side, which my partner and I represent, feels that the de. Reviving The Death Penalty "An eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth" is one of the oldest and most famous sayings in the world.

The hope of deterring these sorts of individuals by making an example out of a criminal will not really make a difference in their final actions. Empirically, one of the major rationales behind allowing the death penalty to remain is that the punishment will deter others from wanting to commit a crime.

Though ruling from a standpoint of fear is already morally questionable, the question remains: It would appear that it does not hold.

Further, of the inmates that were on death row, only 65 of them were executed that year. This staggering discrepancy of condemned to execution ratio can appear anything but frightening to the individual. The analysis that these two present appears to have a definite rational component to it, and the evidence suggests that the death penalty is not a deterrent to commit this type of crime.

In another sample essay on the death penalty , we wrote that the death penalty was a modern tragedy because the deterrence argument does not hold up. Another argument against the use of the death penalty is the high cost that this process has on the taxpayers. One would imagine that a life sentence in prison would be the most expensive punishment that an individual can receive, however the cost of execution is very expensive.

A recent study that was released by the Urban Institute found that the cost of the death penalty is alarmingly high. Further, the study found that the use of the death penalty has taken a great amount of financial resources from the taxpayers over the course of two decades in the sate of Maryland.

The study found that Maryland had spent around million dollars in the cost of utilizing the death penalty as a means of punishment Economist. The amount of resources wasted throughout the sentencing process must also be considered when thinking about the continuation of the use of capital punishment.

Through the lengthy appeals process, a person that will ultimately be sentenced to execution can spend years and millions on appealing and refighting their charges to, ultimately, no avail. This problem does not only appear in the death penalty scenarios, but when the stakes are raised and more money is on the table, this issue becomes something to seriously consider. The wasted money could have easily been spent elsewhere if the death penalty was not still a punishment option for the state, which is especially significant considering the harsh economic time that our nation finds itself in.

These are just some examples of how the outlawing of the death penalty can be quite beneficial to a state and the nation as a whole. As one can plainly see, the benefits financially to a state that outlaws the death penalty seem to far outweigh the reasons for keeping this outdated, extreme form of punishment.

There is one last item to consider in the case of allowing or disbanding the death penalty, and that is the trend that the rest of the world is following. As a world leader, the United States has an obligation to set a standard that the rest of the world can aspire towards.

As reported by the Huffington post, the United States is one of only one tenth of the countries of the world that still carries out state executions, and further, the United States is the only Western democracy to still keep this form of punishment Huffington Post. Some of the other nations that still practice the death penalty includes: These are nations that, for the greater part, the United States would not like to be associated with. However, the United States has drawn lots of criticism over the use of the death penalty.

Many of these nations are ruled by a powerful and brutal dictatorship, and the United States would like to really create separation between their form of government and that of our own. By abolishing the death penalty, the United States will join the ranks of the greater part of the civilized world that does not allow the use of this form of punishment.

As a leader of the free world, it is the responsibility of this nation to take a standpoint that shows the rest of the world that this nation has taken a committed stance against the use of one of the most savage form of punishment. This obligation remains to be one of the most important moral issues that faces the nation on a global stage, especially given that capital punishment is included in the constitution for crimes such as treason. Taking a look at the major reasons for abolishing the death penalty should leave no rational individual in a position where they feel that this type of punishment is still a viable option for the American Justice System.

Modern society has moved away from the days of childish revenge and retaliation tactics and our judicial system should reflect that. The concept of capital punishment is a prime example of such a punishment. Moreover, the arguments laid out show that the death penalty is not viable by addressing three major areas: Due process in these cases takes much longer so that the court can be absolutely sure that the person is guilty before sentencing him to execution.

This helps to eliminate any errors that could lead to executing the wrong person. He also points out that although there is a small possibility for mistakes to be made, this does not mean capital punishment should be abolished. If everything that had the potential for harmful mistakes were outlawed, society would be extremely crippled. It is true that there is disproportionality when it comes to the races and classes that most frequently receive the death penalty. It has been proven that minorities and those with lower income levels are overrepresented on death row.

This is not due to discrimination; this is due to the higher rate at which these groups commit crime ProCon. It has been argued that poverty breeds criminality; if this is true then it makes sense that those at a lower income level would more frequently be sentenced to execution than those at higher income levels ProCon.

It has also been proven that minorities are disproportionately poor, and therefore they would also be more likely to receive the death penalty. Ernest van den Haag said it best:. The only relevant question is: Whether or not others deserved the same punishment, whatever the economic or racial group, have avoided execution is irrelevant. It does not matter what race or economic status a person is, if he is guilty he must receive the appropriate punishment, which in some cases may be the death penalty.

Capital punishment can be a difficult topic to approach because people tend to have extreme views on it. The death penalty is an asset to society; it deters potential criminals as well as serves retribution to criminals, and is in no way immoral. The arguments against the death penalty often do not hold up when examined more closely. It is important that the nation is united on this issue, rather than having some states use capital punishment while others do not.

The death penalty can be an extremely useful tool in sentencing criminals that have committed some of the worst crimes known to society. It is imperative that we begin to pass legislation making capital punishment legal throughout the United States so that justice can be served properly. The Case for Justice. Death Penalty Curricula for High School.

Death Penalty Information Center. This entry was posted on Wednesday, April 24th, at 5: You can follow any comments to this entry through the RSS 2. You can leave a comment , or trackback from your own site. You must be logged in to post a comment. Ernest van den Haag, a professor at Fordham University, wrote about the issue of deterrence: Ernest van den Haag said it best: Works Cited Bosner, Kevin. July 10, at 9: March 23, at March 1, at 9: January 5, at 6: December 1, at 1: December 1, at October 18, at Score Hero Hack Download.

August 19, at 9: July 20, at 3: July 7, at July 1, at June 30, at 8:

41 comments

Main Topics

Privacy Policy

The Death Penalty - Is the death penalty really a rational and effective way to respond to the crimes of certain prisoners. Thirty one percent of society believes we should not keep the death penalty, while others believe that the death penalty doesn’t really keep crime from happening.

Privacy FAQs

The title is Arguments against the Death Penalty yet the author spent the whole time counterclaiming any arguments brought up rather than explaining the logistics behind the arguments. No side was taken in this essay however the title clearly states that the essay should be on arguments against.

About Our Ads

The death penalty, described in this sample argumentative essay, is a highly controversial practice in modern times. While many countries have outlawed it, some (like the United States) practice capital punishment on the state level/5(16). Death Penalty Persuasive Essay. This assignment instructed students to write a persuasive essay which argues for a specific viewpoint or a specific action to be taken on a societal issue. I argued for a specific stance to be taken on the issue of the death penalty.

Cookie Info

English Task –Argumentative Essay The Death Penalty The argument of whether the death penalty is effective is an age-old and contentious issue. An argumentative essay about death penalty. The death penalty is the ultimate punishment. There is no harsher punishment than death itself.