The system would take care of itself. Teaching the basics of good citizenship in school would be a good start to combat this. How to vote, the importance of voting, how the government is supposed to work, etc. However, it does not behoove a leadership that prefers spin over truth to encourage a knowledgeable citizenry. Do yourself and your children a great favor by learning and teaching them the basic responsibilities of good citizenship.
FDR is a good case to discuss when it comes to this issue. The justification for putting a term limit on the presidency was to eliminate the possibility of a charismatic leader taking over the process. Since they are alone as the leader of the executive branch, they wield a particularly large proportion of power as opposed to the legislators, who are tempered by their numbers. It is debatable whether FDR did great things. Although I personally agree with you, there are scores of Republicans and Libertarians who disagree.
I agree with others in the comments that term limits would be good at a reasonable length, maybe at the 10 year mark that has been suggested or 12 for Senate. This is a discussion that has been going on for quite a while, and I suspect it will continue for a while more.
The people of this country have shown that they don't have the capacity to know when a congress person has had enough. The resent history has provided all of us the proof we need to provide better any argument that anyone here could come up with for or against term limits. We have corrupt legislators in Congress.
The constitution doesn't provide for term limits of the president, yet legislators decided we needed a 22nd Amendment to prevent more than two terms in that office. FDR though, did great things during some very tough times.
Had he not died in office, he would have continued to run for office. These very same legislators now don't think term limits should apply to them, because it would be unconstitutional. I would rather trust one man or woman to be president for more than two terms than a group of legislators that have entrenched themselves for life within our governing body to ensure their luxurious lifestyles at our expense.
Set defined term limits, once the limit has been reached do not allow outgoing congress members to stay in Washington as consultants or lobbyists for at least two years. Make them all go home and live under the same laws they passed while in term. LoriCharlie Post 6 strawCake - I disagree with you.
There are term limits for the president, so why shouldn't there be term limits for other elected officials? If the person who holds our highest office doesn't spent years in office before really learning the job, why should it be different for people who are in Congress? I would rather have people in Congress who are actually experienced making the laws, rather than having new people join every couple of years. If everyone in Congress were inexperienced, they would never get anything done. Also, who knows what people would do if they didn't have to worry about being re-elected?
They could just do whatever they wanted, instead of what the people they represent want them to do. I could see that going very, very wrong. SZapper Post 4 betterment - Interesting idea. Ten years sounds about right to me. It's enough time to learn the job and do some things, but it's not long enough to spend your whole adult life in Congress.
I'm sure some people still wouldn't be happy with a year limit, though. The idea of having those same term limits apply to Congress is being debated right now thanks to the ineffectiveness of this governing body. Here are the key points to consider when weighing the pros and cons of Congressional term limits. It encourages more people to get involved with the political process.
Politicians who have made serving in Congress a career that spans decades limit the ability for others to get involved with the process. Term limits require new people to run for the seat in question after a certain amount of time.
It limits the amount of gridlock. Long-term politicians have sheltered themselves into a system where they protect their best interests first. This results in gridlock within the governing process because everyone is basically just trying to get their own piece of the pie. It encourages political growth. If politicians have a limited amount of time to leave a lasting legacy, then they must push forward aggressively with what their district or state wants.
Tight deadlines encourage innovation and political growth. It stops good people from continuing to serve. It is possible that term limits would not have much of an effect on the overall amount of money in the absence of other meaningful reforms but it should limit the amount of time elected officials will have to donate to fundraising. Undemocratic Democracy requires voters have the opportunity to select their elected representatives but term limits control the choice.
Many Americans like their representative and are willing to elect the same person time after time, as demonstrated by the number of incumbents returned each cycle. Why should these voters be deprived of their first choice simply because the person has already served? Because they control who can run for office, term limits are considered by many an undemocratic encroachment on the free will of citizens to select their own representatives.
Punishes Experience Experience is something every employer looks for in a job applicants. The same logic that would lead an employer to hire the most qualified candidate also leads voters to keep electing the same politicians. In todays heated political climate, experience is often used as a derogatory insult by opponents. Term limits would respond to this by eliminating the opportunity for elected officials to gain the experience to be good at their job.
Refreshing congress with a large proportion of new members after every election may sound appealing to those voters who are frustrated with the current state of affairs but it could lead to even more paralysis by preventing representative from learning how to navigate a complicated system. Eliminates Constraints on Conduct Elections are important opportunities for voters to police their representative by either returning them to office or not.
Defined terms free politicians from the burden of facing voters by creating lame duck sessions when the limit has been reached.
During this time, politicians may be motivated by personal interest or the outside influence of powerful organizations rather than the interests of their constituents. Elections create an incentive for representative to respond to the needs of the voters but term limits eliminate this at the end, creating moral hazard.
Reduces Familiarity among Members Working with fellow members is an important part of being a successful legislator. Throughout the history of congress, there are many examples of enduring friendships formed across party lines that helped the institution function properly.
There are some who believe that Congress benefits from fresh blood, while there are others who see the value in government continuity. Each side of the debate has points to make, so with that in mind, let’s take a deeper dive into the pros and cons of Congressional term limits. The Pros of Congressional Term Limits. 1.
Here are some questions and answers about term limits and the ongoing debate surrounding the idea, as well as a look at the pros and cons of term limits for Congress.
The Pros of Term Limits for Congress. 1. Encourages Active Representation The inability of congress to take meaningful action on any number of issues is a frequent justification for the consistently low approval ratings of the institution among voters. Term limits for Congress have various pros and cons to be considered. Seniority creates the ability to facilitate change in Washington DC, but it also creates gridlock because congressional representatives also wish to continue being re-elected.
In the United States, presidential term limits were enacted in The concept was passed by Congress in , then ratified by the states on February 27, It would become the 22nd Amendment to the constitution, limiting a president to two terms in office. In total, a president is permitted. List of Cons of Term Limits for Congress. 1. It gives room to inexperienced politicians. Critics of term limits argue that most new politicians tend to be ideological and lack the experience long-term politicians have.