Are they coming to see the coach? No, they are there supporting the players who have worked so hard. During the course of the season the colleges make millions, meanwhile the players receive nothing. Players should be reimbursed for their time spent under the bright lights of the stadium defending their school, and doing what they love.
Most fans come to see the game, not to admire the architecture of the stadium, or to eat the unhealthy concessions. People wait in lines for hours on end just to get tickets to see the players, not the coaches therefore the players should be give the profits gained from the sporting events, deducting the proceeds that should rightfully go to concessions and stadium staff.
Scandals like this not only risk ruining the reputations of the players, but the reputations of the universities as well. Because athletes are not remunerated for their dedication to their sports colleges may feel pressure to bribe or compensate players for a job well done, or a commitment or contract with the school. In order to prevent the loss of a key player colleges are forced to persuade them to stay with materialistic items such as cars, houses, and money. Doing such things could potentially jeopardize the integrity of the school and of the people involved, thus justifying the importance of the payment of college athletes.
If college athletes were paid for their services to the team they would be more financially equipped to handle their expensive lifestyle, they would be getting some of the money they helped earn the school, and it would potentially eliminate recruiting and black market bribes. If college athletes were paid for their hard work and effort put into the sports they love they would be more financially capable of providing for themselves as individuals.
According to polls among economists, there are no financial factors that prevent the NCAA from paying their athletes. In particular, Rodney Fort, a sports economist and professor of sports management at the University of Michigan, believes that the NCAA already possesses enough money to do so. Moreover, arguments that additional labor costs would hurt sports programs at schools are groundless, says David Berri, a professor of economics at Southern Utah University.
Speaking of skills, by the way, the fact that an athlete is a college student does not automatically mean he or she is an amateur unlike what the NCAA officially claims. For example, a typical first division college football player trains approximately Besides, college athletes also need to dedicate time to studying; along with this, NCAA tournament rules require college students to skip classes in favor of nationally-televised games that bring in revenue Forbes.
No need to say that the revenue goes to the NCAA. Considering this, is it not obvious that college athletes should receive at least some compensation for their efforts? Paying college athletes could also solve a significant problem of athletes quitting schools and colleges. It is not a secret that many of them make a decision to leave due to financial reasons; usually, they are allured by the perspective to start earning money with what they can do best sports outside of college.
Indeed, what is the point for a prospective professional athlete to rush between sports and study for free if they can earn real money doing what they love, and without any obstacles? The reasons why college athletes should be paid are significant. First of all, the NCAA has all the capabilities to pay their athletes—it accumulates tons of revenue annually, so supporting college athletes would not be a problem.
And lastly, many college athletes prefer to start earning real money with their skills rather than rush between sports and study for free, and thus quit schools; paying them might help solve this problem. Is English your native language? What is your profession? Student Teacher Writer Other. Academic Assignment Writing an Essay. Writing a Research Paper.
Research Paper On Paying College Athletes College Athletes Should be Paid Jean M Denis 11/03/14 Enc Freshmen Comp I I. Background and Thesis There has been major discussion recently concerning the topic if college athletes should or shouldn't be paid while they are attending school The first thing the opposition wants .
College Sports: Paying Division One Athletes A huge debate has been on the rise lately relating to why division one athletes should get paid on top of obtaining a scholarship. The proposal states that athletes should be eligible to receive money based on a percentage of profit their school makes.
Student athletes are not professional athletes they are students who attend college to receive an education and participate in sports that they have a scholarship for. Collegiate sports are not a career or profession it is a way for students to . - Paying College Athletes Every child at some point in their lives dream about becoming a rock star, doctor or an astronaut, but the career that stands out the most is becoming a .
Paying college athletes is a difficulty because paying male athletes and female athletes equally would be a huge challenge. Though it may be a choice to play sports in college, I want to know the meaning behind athletes not getting paid. This research project has really improved my writing as a whole. This paper really showcased my writing abilities as a whole. i never would have thought that I would be writing papers upwards of 10 to 15 pages.